GhostTrace LLC — Security Awareness Training for Small Businesses
GhostTrace LLC is a Georgia-based security awareness training and cybersecurity practice (Control No. 26142915), run by founder Daniel Upperman. We run live security awareness training that keeps small businesses insured and compliant.
Who is GhostTrace LLC?
GhostTrace LLC is owned and founded by Daniel Upperman. The company is registered in Georgia, USA with Georgia Control Number 26142915. Founded in 2026, GhostTrace's primary service is live security awareness training for small businesses, producing the documented completion records cyber insurers and regulators require. GhostTrace also provides incident documentation support, exposure monitoring, business and domain due diligence, impersonation takedown packaging, and digital safety reviews. Ethics complaints are reviewed directly by the founder under our published Ethics Complaint process. This is not a law enforcement agency. We do not conduct unauthorized hacking, surveillance, or data theft. We use only legal, public-source research methods, and we do not research individuals.
Founder Details
Founder & Owner: Daniel Upperman | Email: Founder@ghosttrace.net | Company: GhostTrace LLC | Location: Georgia, USA | Registration: Control No. 26142915
GhostTrace isn't a private investigator, a law firm, or law enforcement, and doesn't locate, profile, or run background checks on people.
Daniel Upperman founded GhostTrace LLC in 2026 to help people affected by online fraud, impersonation, and digital abuse document what happened and figure out what to do next. GhostTrace is one person; every request is handled directly by Daniel.
Ethics & Compliance
Ethics complaints come straight to the founder: complaint reviews, policy compliance, and research standards. File a concern via our Ethics Complaint form.
Business registration
GhostTrace LLC is a registered Georgia limited liability company (Control No. 26142915, status Active), formed June 25, 2026. Full registration and registered-agent details are on the Legal page.
Anonymous intelligence submissions:Anonymous form (no account required)
Services
Security awareness training (primary service): live training for small business teams on phishing, invoice fraud, and safe operational practices, with completion certificates and an insurer-ready completion report.
Incident documentation support: help producing the documented records insurers and regulators require after an incident.
Exposure monitoring for your business's own domain, brand terms, and executive identifiers.
Business & domain due diligence on entities and infrastructure using only publicly available information. We do not research individuals.
Impersonation documentation: a platform-ready evidence package when your brand or a team member is being impersonated.
Digital safety review: an audit of your website, email, and domain security, with prioritized fixes.
Enable JavaScript to access the full interactive site, client portal, and staff portal. Content below is rendered by React once JavaScript is available.
"Zero Trust" gets used heavily in security marketing, which has made it sound like a product category rather than what it actually is: a security model built on a specific, simple principle — never trust, always verify, regardless of where a request originates.
What it replaces
Traditional network security worked like a castle wall: strong defenses at the perimeter (firewalls, VPN gateways), and comparatively loose trust for anything already inside. Once a device or user was on the internal network, they were often trusted broadly by default. The problem: once an attacker gets past the perimeter — through a phished credential, a compromised laptop, a misconfigured remote access point — that same broad internal trust works in their favor too.
The Zero Trust principle
Every request for access to a resource is verified on its own merits, regardless of whether it originates "inside" or "outside" the traditional network boundary. Being on the corporate network is not itself a reason to trust a request. Identity, device health, and the specific resource being requested are evaluated every time, not once at the perimeter.
Core components
Strong identity verification — multi-factor authentication as a baseline, not an exception.
Least-privilege access — a user or service gets access only to what its specific role requires, not broad default access "in case it's needed."
Device posture checks — verifying a device meets security requirements (patched, encrypted, not compromised) before granting access, not just verifying the user.
Micro-segmentation — dividing a network into smaller zones so that compromising one segment doesn't automatically grant access to everything else.
Continuous verification — trust isn't granted once per session and forgotten; it's re-evaluated as context changes.
Why it matters more with remote work and cloud services
The traditional network perimeter has effectively dissolved for most businesses — employees work from home networks, access cloud services directly, and use personal devices. "Inside the network" stopped being a meaningful security boundary once a large share of access happens from outside any single physical location the business controls.
A realistic starting point
Zero Trust doesn't have to mean a full infrastructure overhaul on day one. A practical starting sequence: enforce multi-factor authentication everywhere, move from broad default access toward least-privilege for your most sensitive systems, and add device health checks for anything accessing sensitive data. Each step reduces the blast radius of a single compromised credential — which is the actual goal, regardless of how much of the full model you eventually adopt.